2010 Kia Forte Video Review

Publicado en 13. oct, 2010 por admin en En inglés

Cars.com’s Mike Hanley takes a look at the 2010 Kia Forte at the 2009 Chicago Auto Show. Produced by: Matthew Avery

By: Carscom

About the Author:



Plantillitas.com

Puedes encontrar este artículo en los buscadores con los términos:

  • mitsubishi lancer IV evo

También podría interesarte:

Tags: , , , ,

Descuentos desde el 50% fin de semana groupon.com.co Vacantes de Empleos en Bogotá, Colombia Publica y Encuentra Trabajos, Productos y Servicios por $5 Dólares
Comentarios sobre “2010 Kia Forte Video Review”

Puedes comentar utilizando Facebook, pero si deseas realizar una consulta directamente en el sitio por favor utiliza el Sistema de Comentarios que está al final de esta sección.

  • Kulaness
    Devilwearsprada, apparently has nothing intelligent to say only negative things. Move on idiot.
  • gorrammit
    I’ve never liked the styling of the Korean cars (except the 2nd last gen Tiburon and Sonata) but this time Kia has got the styling dead on! It’s rare to be able to create an attractive styling you could carry across the model line-ups. Can’t say the same for Hyundai though, they took the worst of the Toyota swoopy lines and ran with it. Hideous, IMHO.
  • jetsetter14
    Ooo I like the white one in the background with the black roof. Nice! :P
  • Causalspark
    @3x0rcyst3m I’m a big fan of Hyundai/Kia, and I do acknowledge that there was a time where they weren’t very good. They’ve definitely stepped it up with these new cars, though. I can’t really stand by the Rio, honestly. Besides that, both companies make fantastic cars that gets high ratings in Consumer Reports, even toppling Honda and Toyota.
  • CeruleanTwist
    God that interior is ugly…but everything else sounds at least decent.
  • armani1992
    @AVIV222
    its better looking than the honda accord
  • TheeDevilWearsPrada
    @marth1800 And the interior is **** too.
  • AVIV222
    maby good but the design is acheap copy of the honda acord
 
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  Buscas algo más? Encuéntralo aquí