Inicio / VARIOS / En inglés / Crash Test 1959 Chevrolet Bel Air VS. 2009 Chevrolet Malibu (Frontal Offset) IIHS 50th Anniversary

Crash Test 1959 Chevrolet Bel Air VS. 2009 Chevrolet Malibu (Frontal Offset) IIHS 50th Anniversary

25 Comentarios

  1. This test is somewhat biased – the Bel Air has fifty years of elements, gravity, and wear and tear on it, especially on the frame – the only way to be true to the test would be to buy a new one or build on using the original specs.

  2. how could you do that!!!!!!!!!!!

  3. FormulaOneFan4Eva

    what was the fucking point of destroying a ’59 bel air?!?!?

    we all know it would be **** in a crash, so don’t crash it!

  4. ????? ???? ???? ????? ???? ???? ???? ???? ??? ?? ????? ?????

  5. to show fucking improvement you kill a bel air – fools

  6. the bell air is still cooler even if it is a death trap

  7. DamnStraightM35A2

    @Jimmy81691 It’s the chance you take everytime you drive down the road. It’s called defensive driving, and it decreases accident risks. Remember when the old cars were ner people weren’t texting, drinking coffee, putting on makeup, eating, or reading the paper. They payed attention to the road.

  8. One less ’59 Chevy in the world? Always a good thing. That was the ugliest car Chevrolet ever made.

  9. Sucks that they destroyed that old Bel Air.

  10. @31Roadsterford The % of Auto-mobile deaths in car crashes had went down year on year. In line with improved safety standards.
    w w w -fars.nhtsa.dot.gov/Main/index.aspx

  11. @DamnStraightM35A2
    Right, but what if that bad driver in the ’09 Malibu slams into the good driver in the ’59?

Deja una respuesta

Tu dirección de correo electrónico no será publicada. Los campos obligatorios están marcados con *