This test is somewhat biased – the Bel Air has fifty years of elements, gravity, and wear and tear on it, especially on the frame – the only way to be true to the test would be to buy a new one or build on using the original specs.
@Jimmy81691 It’s the chance you take everytime you drive down the road. It’s called defensive driving, and it decreases accident risks. Remember when the old cars were ner people weren’t texting, drinking coffee, putting on makeup, eating, or reading the paper. They payed attention to the road.
@31Roadsterford The % of Auto-mobile deaths in car crashes had went down year on year. In line with improved safety standards.
w w w -fars.nhtsa.dot.gov/Main/index.aspx
This test is somewhat biased – the Bel Air has fifty years of elements, gravity, and wear and tear on it, especially on the frame – the only way to be true to the test would be to buy a new one or build on using the original specs.
how could you do that!!!!!!!!!!!
what was the fucking point of destroying a ’59 bel air?!?!?
we all know it would be **** in a crash, so don’t crash it!
????? ???? ???? ????? ???? ???? ???? ???? ??? ?? ????? ?????
to show fucking improvement you kill a bel air – fools
the bell air is still cooler even if it is a death trap
@Jimmy81691 It’s the chance you take everytime you drive down the road. It’s called defensive driving, and it decreases accident risks. Remember when the old cars were ner people weren’t texting, drinking coffee, putting on makeup, eating, or reading the paper. They payed attention to the road.
One less ’59 Chevy in the world? Always a good thing. That was the ugliest car Chevrolet ever made.
Sucks that they destroyed that old Bel Air.
@31Roadsterford The % of Auto-mobile deaths in car crashes had went down year on year. In line with improved safety standards.
w w w -fars.nhtsa.dot.gov/Main/index.aspx
@DamnStraightM35A2
Right, but what if that bad driver in the ’09 Malibu slams into the good driver in the ’59?